CIRCLE DR WB over RDWY,UP RR,BNSF RR,DITC

Map

Coordinates:
+38.79769, -104.78511
38°47'52" N, 104°47'06" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	CIRCLE DR WB over RDWY,UP RR,BNSF RR,DITC
Structure number:	CSG-I.71-06.10W
Location:	0.7 MI NE OF JCT I25
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	59.1 ft. `[18.0 m]`
Total length:	484.9 ft. `[147.8 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	34.1 ft. `[10.4 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	19.7 ft. `[6.0 m]`
Skew angle:	15°
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency `[04]`
Year built:	1963
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 `[4]`
Number of main spans:	9
Main spans material:	Steel continuous `[4]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	36,505 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	3% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	56.8
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement `[33]`
Estimated cost of work:	$2,495,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
March 2018	Poor	Poor	Fair	Fair	36505	56.8
May 2016	Poor	Poor	Fair	Fair	14390	60.5
May 2014	Poor	Poor	Fair	Fair	14390	57.5
May 2012	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	16757	59.2
May 2010	Poor	Fair	Fair	Poor	16757	44.9
March 2008	Poor	Fair	Fair	Poor	16757	44.9

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	1,940	1,380	488	72	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	1,940	1,380	0	560	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	16,490	13,604	2,886	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	16,490	15,666	824	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	16	16	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	70	69	1	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	282	182	100	0	0
Joints
Pourable Joint	linear ft.	70	38	16	8	8
Other Joint	linear ft.	282	243	39	0	0
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	36	0	36	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	36	36	0	0	0
Fixed Bearing	each	12	0	0	12	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	12	0	0	12	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	970	448	437	85	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	970	485	0	485	0