CIRCLE DR WB over RDWY,UP RR,BNSF RR,DITC
Map
Coordinates:
+38.79769, -104.7851138°47'52" N, 104°47'06" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CIRCLE DR WB over RDWY,UP RR,BNSF RR,DITC |
Structure number: | CSG-I.71-06.10W |
Location: | 0.7 MI NE OF JCT I25 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 59.1 ft. [18.0 m] |
Total length: | 484.9 ft. [147.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1963 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 9 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 36,505 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 56.8 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
Estimated cost of work: | $2,495,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 36505 | 56.8 |
May 2016 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 14390 | 60.5 |
May 2014 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 14390 | 57.5 |
May 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 16757 | 59.2 |
May 2010 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 16757 | 44.9 |
March 2008 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 16757 | 44.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,940 | 1,380 | 488 | 72 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,940 | 1,380 | 0 | 560 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 16,490 | 13,604 | 2,886 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 16,490 | 15,666 | 824 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 70 | 69 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 282 | 182 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 70 | 38 | 16 | 8 | 8 |
Other Joint | linear ft. | 282 | 243 | 39 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 36 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 36 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 970 | 448 | 437 | 85 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 970 | 485 | 0 | 485 | 0 |