HUMBOLDT ST over EAST HARVARD GULCH
Map
Coordinates:
+39.67125, -104.9699839°40'17" N, 104°58'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HUMBOLDT ST over EAST HARVARD GULCH |
Structure number: | D-13-HGE-100 |
Location: | HUMBOLDT & E HARVARD |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Total length: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 44.6 ft. [13.6 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1967 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 384 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 70.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 384 | 70.9 |
November 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 254 | 73.0 |
November 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 254 | 73.0 |
November 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 254 | 73.0 |
November 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 278 | 73.0 |
September 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 278 | 73.0 |
January 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 323 | 73.0 |
September 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 323 | 73.0 |
September 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 323 | 72.2 |
July 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 273 | 72.0 |
December 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 273 | 89.5 |
December 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 273 | 89.5 |
May 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 188 | 89.5 |
November 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 188 | 89.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 89 | 84 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 58 | 53 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 58 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,291 | 1,271 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,291 | 1,031 | 130 | 130 | 0 |