ALLEY over EAST HARVARD GULCH
Map
Coordinates:
+39.66924, -104.9494939°40'09" N, 104°56'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ALLEY over EAST HARVARD GULCH |
Structure number: | D-13-HGE-230 |
Location: | BTWN STEELE AND ADAMS |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Total length: | 47.6 ft. [14.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1967 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 46 [as of 2016] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 72.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 46 | 72.8 |
November 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 11 | 83.8 |
November 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 11 | 83.8 |
November 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 11 | 83.8 |
November 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 83.8 |
September 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 83.8 |
January 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 76 | 83.8 |
September 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 76 | 83.8 |
November 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 76 | 83.7 |
July 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 39 | 83.5 |
December 1999 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 39 | 83.5 |
December 1998 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 39 | 83.5 |
May 1996 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 12 | 83.5 |
November 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 12 | 79.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 20 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 40 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 95 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 95 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 935 | 882 | 53 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 719 | 0 | 216 | 503 | 0 |