US 40 TO WB I 70 over W FORK CLEAR CREEK SR
Map
Coordinates:
+39.75879, -105.6604539°45'32" N, 105°39'38" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 40 TO WB I 70 over W FORK CLEAR CREEK SR |
Structure number: | E-14-BH |
Location: | 3.5 MI NE OF GEORGETOWN |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 76.1 ft. [23.2 m] |
Total length: | 79.7 ft. [24.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 30.2 ft. [9.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.8 ft. [10.6 m] |
Skew angle: | 46° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2000 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,388 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 81.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1388 | 81.7 |
April 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 591 | 86.7 |
April 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 591 | 86.7 |
June 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 71 | 95.0 |
June 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 71 | 95.0 |
May 2007 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 71 | 95.0 |
June 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 69 | 95.0 |
June 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 389 | 94.9 |
May 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 389 | 94.9 |
February 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 340 | 94.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 380 | 380 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,772 | 2,744 | 28 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,402 | 2,402 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concrete Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 2,402 | 2,402 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 100 | 95 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 96 | 96 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 160 | 160 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 160 | 160 | 0 | 0 | 0 |