Fifth Street over White River
Map
Coordinates:
+40.03464, -107.9113340°02'05" N, 107°54'41" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Fifth Street over White River |
Structure number: | MKR-FIFTH ST |
Location: | 1 Blk. So of Water Street |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Total length: | 81.0 ft. [24.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 9.2 ft. [2.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1940 |
Year reconstructed: | 2001 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 117 [as of 2012] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 47.3 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $230,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 117 | 47.3 |
September 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 117 | 49.6 |
September 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 117 | 49.6 |
September 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 117 | 49.6 |
October 2010 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 139 | 49.2 |
September 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 139 | 49.2 |
September 2006 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 86 | 49.8 |
July 2004 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 86 | 45.9 |
October 2002 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 86 | 49.0 |
October 2001 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 164 | 46.7 |
August 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 164 | 46.7 |
July 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 164 | 46.7 |
October 1995 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 37 | 39.5 |
August 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 37 | 50.7 |
September 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 37 | 50.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 486 | 0 | 485 | 1 | 0 |
Substructure |
Steel Column | each | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Abutment | linear ft. | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 |
Steel Pier Cap | linear ft. | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Timber Deck | sq. ft. | 1,304 | 0 | 980 | 324 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 162 | 107 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 162 | 107 | 0 | 0 | 55 |