US 160 ML over MONTE VISTA CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+37.58590, -106.1971937°35'09" N, 106°11'50" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 160 ML over MONTE VISTA CANAL |
Structure number: | N-12-F |
Location: | 11.4 MI E OF JCT SH 112 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Total length: | 123.0 ft. [37.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 62.7 ft. [19.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 8° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 4,900 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 97.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4900 | 97.5 |
March 2015 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4900 | 97.5 |
March 2013 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4900 | 97.5 |
March 2011 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 5300 | 97.5 |
January 2009 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 5300 | 95.5 |
March 2007 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 6100 | 95.4 |
February 2003 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4756 | 95.6 |
March 1999 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4574 | 95.6 |
February 1997 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4100 | 95.6 |
February 1995 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4100 | 98.7 |
January 1993 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4500 | 96.7 |
January 1992 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4000 | 97.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 600 | 476 | 100 | 24 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 254 | 254 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 254 | 254 | 0 | 0 | 0 |