County Road 22 over S Fork Frenchman Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+40.58547, -102.4556740°35'08" N, 102°27'20" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | County Road 22 over S Fork Frenchman Creek |
Structure number: | PH22-0.0-23 |
Location: | Inter. of Co.Rds 22 & |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Total length: | 78.7 ft. [24.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 45° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1968 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B] |
Average daily traffic: | 37 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 62.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 37 | 62.6 |
December 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 37 | 70.0 |
December 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 37 | 70.0 |
December 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 37 | 70.0 |
December 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 51 | 80.0 |
December 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 51 | 80.0 |
October 2005 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 103 | 48.6 |
October 2003 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 163 | 62.9 |
March 2001 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 163 | 62.7 |
March 2000 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 163 | 68.9 |
March 1999 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 163 | 79.9 |
March 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 163 | 79.9 |
June 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 65 | 85.4 |
May 1994 | Poor | Good | Good | Critical | 65 | 40.0 |
March 1992 | Poor | Good | Good | Critical | 65 | 40.0 |
May 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 84.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 630 | 0 | 630 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 630 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 630 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,891 | 0 | 1,261 | 630 | 0 |
Substructure |
Steel Column | each | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 68 | 51 | 15 | 2 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 68 | 0 | 68 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pier Cap | linear ft. | 68 | 0 | 68 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 158 | 132 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 158 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 26 |