County Road 29 over S Fork Frenchman Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+40.59547, -102.3982240°35'44" N, 102°23'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | County Road 29 over S Fork Frenchman Creek |
Structure number: | PH29-0.7-22-A |
Location: | 0.7 Mi. No. of Co. Rd. 22 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 67.3 ft. [20.5 m] |
Total length: | 143.4 ft. [43.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1990 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 70 [as of 2012] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 92.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 70 | 92.4 |
December 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 92.4 |
December 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 92.4 |
December 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 92.4 |
December 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 92.4 |
December 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 93.4 |
October 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 76 | 93.4 |
October 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 59 | 91.0 |
March 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 59 | 90.7 |
March 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 59 | 90.7 |
March 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 59 | 90.7 |
March 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 59 | 90.7 |
June 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 77 | 90.7 |
May 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 77 | 98.7 |
March 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 77 | 99.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,003 | 953 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,003 | 351 | 602 | 0 | 50 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 37 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 75 | 73 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Deck |
Corrugated or Orthotropic Deck | sq. ft. | 4,629 | 0 | 4,626 | 3 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 4,629 | 4,629 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 4,629 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,629 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 37 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 0 |
Open Joint | linear ft. | 37 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 287 | 287 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 287 | 287 | 0 | 0 | 0 |