County Road 29 over N Fork Frenchman Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+40.62578, -102.3980040°37'33" N, 102°23'53" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | County Road 29 over N Fork Frenchman Creek |
Structure number: | PH29-0.7-26-A |
Location: | 0.7 Mi. No. of Co. Rd 26 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Total length: | 40.7 ft. [12.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.6 ft. [8.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.5 ft. [8.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1987 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 6 [as of 2012] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 95.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6 | 95.6 |
December 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6 | 95.6 |
December 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6 | 95.6 |
December 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6 | 95.6 |
December 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 11 | 95.6 |
December 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 11 | 96.6 |
October 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8 | 96.6 |
October 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 14 | 94.1 |
March 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 14 | 93.9 |
March 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 14 | 93.9 |
March 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 14 | 93.9 |
March 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 14 | 93.9 |
June 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 27 | 93.9 |
May 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 27 | 99.0 |
March 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 27 | 100.0 |
May 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 100.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 244 | 0 | 244 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 244 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 244 |
Substructure |
Steel Column | each | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Steel Abutment | linear ft. | 57 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 57 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pier Cap | linear ft. | 57 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 57 | 29 | 28 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Corrugated or Orthotropic Deck | sq. ft. | 1,153 | 0 | 1,153 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,153 | 1,153 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,153 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,153 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 81 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 81 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 0 |