County Road 5 over Piceance Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+39.97900, -108.2521139°58'44" N, 108°15'08" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | County Road 5 over Piceance Creek |
Structure number: | RIOB-005-31.98 |
Location: | 9.9 Mi S of St Hwy 64 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Total length: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 868 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 40% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 59.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 868 | 59.2 |
September 2016 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 868 | 59.2 |
September 2014 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 868 | 59.2 |
September 2012 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 868 | 59.2 |
September 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 2128 | 71.6 |
September 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 2128 | 71.6 |
August 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 568 | 95.3 |
July 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 568 | 92.3 |
October 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 568 | 81.2 |
October 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 135 | 84.8 |
August 1999 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 135 | 83.8 |
July 1997 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 135 | 94.8 |
October 1995 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 108 | 94.9 |
August 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 108 | 90.7 |
September 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 108 | 91.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 456 | 0 | 256 | 200 | 0 |
Substructure |
Steel Column | each | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
Steel Abutment | linear ft. | 56 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 28 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 |
Steel Pier Cap | linear ft. | 56 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 15 |
Deck |
Corrugated or Orthotropic Deck | sq. ft. | 845 | 0 | 632 | 212 | 1 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 818 | 818 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 845 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 845 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 61 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 61 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 |