COUNTY ROAD 21 over ANIMAS RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+37.82719, -107.6263337°49'38" N, 107°37'35" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROAD 21 over ANIMAS RIVER |
Structure number: | SJN21-00.2A |
Location: | 2.9 MI NE OF SILVERTON |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 58.4 ft. [17.8 m] |
Total length: | 61.7 ft. [18.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.3 ft. [7.1 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1989 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 21 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 90.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 21 | 90.8 |
June 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 21 | 90.8 |
June 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 31 | 90.8 |
June 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 31 | 90.7 |
June 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 26 | 90.8 |
June 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 26 | 90.8 |
May 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 26 | 90.8 |
May 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 26 | 90.8 |
June 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 26 | 90.8 |
September 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 26 | 90.8 |
September 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 26 | 90.8 |
October 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 18 | 90.8 |
August 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 18 | 90.9 |
August 1992 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Very Good | 18 | 90.9 |
September 1990 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 25 | 90.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 246 | 0 | 246 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,435 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 47 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 123 | 123 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 123 | 123 | 0 | 0 | 0 |