ROUTE 10 over ROUTE 322

Map

Coordinates:
+41.56485, -72.89108
41°33'53" N, 72°53'28" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	ROUTE 10 over ROUTE 322
Structure number:	00518
Location:	ROUTE 10 OVER ROUTE 322
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	59.1 ft. `[18.0 m]`
Total length:	59.1 ft. `[18.0 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	34.1 ft. `[10.4 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	13.1 ft. `[4.0 m]`
Skew angle:	27°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1936
Year reconstructed:	1987
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 `[4]`
Main span material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main span design:	Frame `[07]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	5,200 `[as of 2015]`
Truck traffic:	6% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Sufficiency rating:	49.0
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of relocation of road. `[32]`
Estimated cost of work:	$4,600,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
May 2017	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	5200	49.0
May 2015	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	5000	51.0
May 2013	Poor	-	Poor	Satisfactory	5000	54.0
May 2011	Poor	-	Poor	Satisfactory	4900	54.0
April 2009	Poor	-	Poor	Satisfactory	5100	50.0
April 2007	Poor	-	Poor	Satisfactory	6400	48.0
March 2005	Poor	-	Poor	Satisfactory	6500	48.0
January 2003	Poor	-	Poor	Satisfactory	5000	50.0
January 2001	Fair	-	Fair	Satisfactory	5000	66.0
February 1999	Fair	-	Fair	Satisfactory	4900	66.0
January 1997	Fair	-	Fair	Satisfactory	4900	66.0
November 1994	Fair	-	Fair	Good	4900	66.0
December 1992	Fair	-	Fair	Good	4600	66.0
December 1990	Fair	-	Satisfactory	Good	5000	77.0

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Arch	linear ft.	59	0	28	31	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	72	30	42	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	118	118	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	118	85	30	3	0