Share: 
L'Enfant Plaza over RAILROAD
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | L'Enfant Plaza over RAILROAD |
| Structure number: | 0517 |
| Location: | 10th Street, S.W. |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad |
| Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
| Length of largest span: | 83.0 ft. [25.3 m] |
| Total length: | 83.0 ft. [25.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 51.5 ft. [15.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 166.3 ft. [50.7 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1961 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2015
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 7,500 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
| Operating rating: | 98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 63.9 tons [58.1 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 81.1 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 2015 | 81.1 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 7500 |
| January 2013 | 82.1 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 7500 |
| December 2010 | 73.1 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | - | 7500 |
| June 2008 | 73.1 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | - | 7500 |
| July 2006 | 73.1 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 7500 |
| October 2003 | 64.9 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | - | 7500 |
| February 2001 | 76.1 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 7500 |
| March 1999 | 76.1 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | - | 7500 |
| September 1998 | 76.1 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | - | 7500 |
© Copyright 2012-18, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1076662
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1076662