RAMP E & RAMP over PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS
Map
Coordinates:
+38.88139, -77.0095738°52'53" N, 77°00'34" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RAMP E & RAMP over PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS |
Structure number: | 1104(PED. U.P.) |
Location: | SO.CAPITOL ST.& SW FR |
Purpose: | Carries highway over pedestrian/bicycle trail |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 45.3 ft. [13.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 52.5 ft. [16.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1964 |
Year reconstructed: | 1991 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 25,000 [as of 1992] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 81.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 25000 | 81.3 |
June 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 25000 | 81.3 |
June 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 25000 | 80.3 |
August 2012 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 25000 | 79.2 |
October 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 25000 | 79.2 |
August 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 25000 | 91.6 |
August 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 25000 | 94.6 |
August 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 25000 | 94.6 |
July 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 25000 | 94.6 |
March 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 25000 | 94.6 |
September 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 25000 | 94.6 |
September 1995 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Very Good | 25000 | 75.7 |
August 1992 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Very Good | 25000 | 75.7 |
May 1989 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Very Good | 25000 | 75.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 100 | 80 | 13 | 7 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 23 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 92 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 46 | 33 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
Concrete Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 368 | 78 | 90 | 90 | 110 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,208 | 892 | 313 | 3 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,042 | 882 | 0 | 160 | 0 |