Share:

CR-621 over ROSS'S DITCH

Map 

Coordinates:
+27.31833, -81.26472
27°19'06" N, 81°15'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CR-621 over ROSS'S DITCH
Structure number:090005
Location:8.7MI S OF US-98
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:10.8 ft. [3.3 m]
Total length:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:500 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:20% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:52.0 tons [47.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:31.2 tons [28.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.7

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
June 201692.7Good7 out of 10-500
June 201492.7Good8 out of 10-500
June 201292.7Good8 out of 10-500
July 201095.7Good8 out of 10-500
July 200895.7Good8 out of 10-500
July 200695.5Good8 out of 10-500
July 200495.5Good8 out of 10-500
July 200295.7Good8 out of 10-500
July 200095.6Good8 out of 10-500
July 199895.7Good7 out of 10-500
March 199684.9Fair5 out of 10-500
March 199482.8Fair5 out of 10-700
February 199282.8Fair5 out of 10-700