Share:

N. WESTSHORE BLVD. over RAYTHEON DITCH

Map

Coordinates:
+27.96638, -82.52411
27°57'59" N, 82°31'27" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:N. WESTSHORE BLVD. over RAYTHEON DITCH
Structure number:104479
Location:0.4MI N OF SR616/SPRUCE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:10.2 ft. [3.1 m]
Total length:20.7 ft. [6.3 m]
Skew angle:58°
Owner:Other Local Agencies [25]
Year built:1986
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,120 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:99.1

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
February 2016Good7 out of 101012099.1
February 2014Good7 out of 101012099.1
February 2012Good7 out of 101012099.1
February 2010Good7 out of 10100099.9
February 2008Good7 out of 10100099.9
February 2006Good7 out of 10100099.9
April 2004Good7 out of 10100099.9
March 2002Good7 out of 10100099.9
September 2000Good7 out of 10100099.9