KISMET PARKWAY over ZANZABAR CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+26.69690, -81.9928626°41'49" N, 81°59'34" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | KISMET PARKWAY over ZANZABAR CANAL |
Structure number: | 125582 |
Location: | 0.2MI W OF NELSON ROAD |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Total length: | 48.9 ft. [14.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 65.9 ft. [20.1 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1973 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 5,000 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 88.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 5000 | 88.3 |
December 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 5000 | 88.3 |
December 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 5000 | 88.3 |
December 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 5000 | 89.6 |
December 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 5000 | 89.6 |
December 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 89.6 |
December 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4700 | 89.6 |
December 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4700 | 89.6 |
December 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4700 | 89.6 |
December 1999 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 510 | 85.1 |
December 1997 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 510 | 85.6 |
December 1995 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 500 | 84.6 |
December 1993 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 110 | 84.7 |
October 1991 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 110 | 72.7 |