CR 69A over Thomas Mill Creek


+30.56789, -85.07035
30°34'04" N, 85°04'13" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CR 69A over Thomas Mill Creek
Structure number:470008
Location:0.7 Miles South of CR 274
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:10.8 ft. [3.3 m]
Total length:31.2 ft. [9.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1959
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:450 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:88.9

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
August 2018Fair5 out of 1045088.9
August 2016Fair5 out of 1045088.9
September 2014Good7 out of 1045099.7
October 2012Good7 out of 1022099.9
November 2010Good7 out of 1022099.9
December 2008Good7 out of 1022099.9
January 2007Good7 out of 1022099.9
January 2005Good7 out of 1022099.9
February 2003Good7 out of 1022099.9
February 2001Good7 out of 1022098.9
March 1999Good7 out of 1022092.2
March 1997Good7 out of 1022092.6
February 1995Good7 out of 1022098.9
March 1993Good7 out of 1022098.9
March 1991Fair5 out of 1022087.8