Share: 
CR 183A over Parrish Branch
Map
Coordinates:
+30.76450, -86.02233
30°45'52" N, 86°01'20" W
+30.76450, -86.02233
30°45'52" N, 86°01'20" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | CR 183A over Parrish Branch |
| Structure number: | 524101 |
| Location: | 0.6 Miles North of CR 10A |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
| Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Skew angle: | 18° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1961 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 300 [as of 2017] |
| Truck traffic: | 17% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 98.8 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2017 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 300 | 98.8 |
| March 2015 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 300 | 87.8 |
| March 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 300 | 99.0 |
| March 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 99.0 |
| April 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 100.0 |
| May 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 100.0 |
| June 2005 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 100.0 |
| July 2003 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 100.0 |
| August 2001 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 100.0 |
| July 1999 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 100.0 |
| June 1997 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 100.0 |
| June 1995 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 100.0 |
| June 1993 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 100.0 |
| June 1991 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 100.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1083029
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1083029