I-95 SB TO I195 EB over I-195 & 1-95 & RAMPS
Map
Coordinates:
+25.81292, -80.2062825°48'47" N, 80°12'23" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I-95 SB TO I195 EB over I-195 & 1-95 & RAMPS |
Structure number: | 870331 |
Location: | I-95/SR112/I-195 INTRCHG |
Purpose: | Carries highway overpass (third level) over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
Length of largest span: | 159.1 ft. [48.5 m] |
Total length: | 1104.1 ft. [336.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 31.2 ft. [9.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.8 ft. [10.6 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 99° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1959 |
Year reconstructed: | 2004 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 25,500 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 83.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 25500 | 83.7 |
December 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 25000 | 83.8 |
December 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 23500 | 89.4 |
December 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 21500 | 89.8 |
December 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 18500 | 85.1 |
December 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 18500 | 82.1 |
December 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 18500 | 84.2 |
December 2004 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 18500 | 74.0 |
December 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 20702 | 74.0 |
November 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20702 | 72.0 |
October 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5720 | 71.9 |
October 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5720 | 75.0 |
November 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5720 | 75.0 |
November 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5720 | 75.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,794 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 22,425 | 22,425 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 4,830 | 4,829 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 38,420 | 25,162 | 13,245 | 13 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 34 | 33 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 504 | 481 | 20 | 3 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 72 | 56 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 500 | 498 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Movable Bearing | each | 54 | 34 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 108 | 108 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 102 | 82 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 204 | 204 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pot Bearing | each | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 36 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 2,208 | 2,156 | 50 | 2 | 0 |