I-95 TO SR-836 WB over NW 7TH AVE & SALRR
Map
Coordinates:
+25.78944, -80.2063925°47'22" N, 80°12'23" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I-95 TO SR-836 WB over NW 7TH AVE & SALRR |
Structure number: | 870363 |
Location: | MIDTOWN INTERCHANGE |
Purpose: | Carries highway overpass over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
Length of largest span: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
Total length: | 532.2 ft. [162.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 38.4 ft. [11.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 41.3 ft. [12.6 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 99° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1969 |
Year reconstructed: | 1994 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 7 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 33,500 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 52.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 33500 | 52.8 |
May 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 40000 | 67.8 |
May 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 37500 | 68.3 |
May 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 36000 | 68.6 |
May 2009 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 31500 | 70.5 |
May 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 31500 | 71.6 |
May 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 31500 | 92.0 |
May 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 29795 | 92.2 |
May 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 29795 | 92.2 |
May 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 71500 | 86.8 |
April 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 71500 | 86.8 |
April 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 71500 | 86.1 |
March 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 96.0 |
January 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 96.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 4,812 | 4,012 | 0 | 800 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 25,296 | 24,394 | 900 | 2 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 25 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 128 | 128 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 384 | 378 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 410 | 408 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 123 | 123 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 1,196 | 846 | 0 | 350 | 0 |