NW 20TH ST WB over LWDD E-4 (El Rio) Canal
Map
Coordinates:
+26.36968, -80.0946726°22'11" N, 80°05'41" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NW 20TH ST WB over LWDD E-4 (El Rio) Canal |
Structure number: | 934421 |
Location: | 0.5MI W of N DIXIE HIGHWY |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1962 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 12,000 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 77.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 12000 | 77.3 |
October 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 12000 | 77.3 |
October 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 77.7 |
October 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 77.7 |
October 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 77.7 |
October 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 77.7 |
October 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 77.7 |
November 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 77.7 |
November 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 77.7 |
March 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 69.2 |
March 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 69.2 |
March 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 69.0 |
March 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 68.5 |
March 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 68.7 |
January 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 69.7 |
January 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4500 | 69.7 |
November 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 4500 | 68.7 |