CR-712 (MIDWAY RD) over NORTH FORK ST LUCIE RVR
Map
Coordinates:
+27.37437, -80.3424827°22'28" N, 80°20'33" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR-712 (MIDWAY RD) over NORTH FORK ST LUCIE RVR |
Structure number: | 940035 |
Location: | 1MI W of US-1 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Total length: | 166.0 ft. [50.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 36.7 ft. [11.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 43.3 ft. [13.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1981 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 15,900 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 88.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 15900 | 88.6 |
January 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 15900 | 88.6 |
January 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 15900 | 88.6 |
January 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 15900 | 90.9 |
January 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 15900 | 90.9 |
January 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 15900 | 90.9 |
March 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 15900 | 90.9 |
January 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 15900 | 93.2 |
March 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 15900 | 93.2 |
March 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 10000 | 94.6 |
March 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10000 | 94.6 |
March 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 97.9 |
February 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 5000 | 97.9 |
January 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 5000 | 97.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 89 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 24 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 177 | 177 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 166 | 166 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 332 | 332 | 0 | 0 | 0 |