Share: 
NORTH 2ND STREET over MOORES CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+27.45061, -80.32519
27°27'02" N, 80°19'31" W
+27.45061, -80.32519
27°27'02" N, 80°19'31" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | NORTH 2ND STREET over MOORES CREEK |
| Structure number: | 945000 |
| Location: | 0.2 MI N OF ORANGE AVE. |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Total length: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 53.2 ft. [16.2 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1925 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1997 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 240 [as of 2017] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 97.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 2017 | Good | - | Good | Good | 240 | 97.0 |
| January 2015 | Good | - | Good | Good | 240 | 97.0 |
| January 2013 | Good | - | Good | Good | 240 | 97.0 |
| January 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 240 | 97.0 |
| January 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 240 | 97.0 |
| January 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 240 | 97.0 |
| March 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 240 | 97.0 |
| January 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 240 | 97.0 |
| January 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 240 | 97.0 |
| January 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 97.0 |
| January 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 97.0 |
| September 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 10 | 81.0 |
| February 1993 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Satisfactory | - | 57.2 |
| January 1991 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Satisfactory | - | 72.1 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1089693
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1089693