Share:

GRAHAM-ZOAR ROAD over BIG SATILLA CREEK TRIB

Map

Coordinates:
+31.78016, -82.52056
31°46'49" N, 82°31'14" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:GRAHAM-ZOAR ROAD over BIG SATILLA CREEK TRIB
Structure number:000000000100430
Location:4 MI S OF GRAHAM
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Total length:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Skew angle:46°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:230 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:42.6 tons [38.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.8 tons [22.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:89.6
Estimated cost of work:$158,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
January 201789.6Fair6 out of 10-230
January 201592.3Good7 out of 10-230
January 201392.3Good7 out of 10-230
February 201192.2Good7 out of 10-290
January 200992.2Good7 out of 10-290
January 200792.3Good7 out of 10-240
January 200592.3Good7 out of 10-180
January 200392.2Good7 out of 10-300
January 200190.7Good7 out of 10-480
February 199990.7Fair6 out of 10-480
August 199690.9Good8 out of 10-300
August 199490.9Good8 out of 10-300
August 199291.0Good8 out of 10-250
August 199091.0Good8 out of 10-240

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Culvert
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.112112000