Share:

CLIFTON STREET over SUGAR CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+33.74445, -84.33203
33°44'40" N, 84°19'55" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CLIFTON STREET over SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000008951160
Location:IN ATLANTA CITY LIMITS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Skew angle:36°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,202 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:108.9 tons [99.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:108.9 tons [99.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.9
Estimated cost of work:$152,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
May 201699.9Good7 out of 10-2202
May 201499.9Good7 out of 10-2202
May 201299.9Good7 out of 10-2202
June 201099.9Good7 out of 10-1900
September 200899.9Good7 out of 10-1900
June 200699.9Good7 out of 10-2010
June 200499.9Good7 out of 10-1560
June 200299.9Good7 out of 10-1560
July 200099.8Good7 out of 10-4300
July 199899.8Fair6 out of 10-4300
March 199699.7Fair6 out of 10-4300
January 199499.7Fair6 out of 10-4300
March 199299.7Fair6 out of 10-4300

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Culvert
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.432432000