Share:

EMPIRE-CHESTER HWY over GUM SWAMP CREEK TRIB

Map

Coordinates:
+32.36799, -83.21231
32°22'05" N, 83°12'44" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:EMPIRE-CHESTER HWY over GUM SWAMP CREEK TRIB
Structure number:000000009100310
Location:4 MI SW OF CHESTER
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:7.9 ft. [2.4 m]
Total length:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:940 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:16% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:60.4 tons [54.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:100.0
Estimated cost of work:$205,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
December 2015100.0Good7 out of 10-940
December 2013100.0Good7 out of 10-940
November 2011100.0Good7 out of 10-880
December 2009100.0Good7 out of 10-1120
December 2007100.0Good7 out of 10-1120
November 2005100.0Good7 out of 10-1170
December 200399.9Good7 out of 10-1200
January 200292.4Good7 out of 10-1200
November 199992.4Good7 out of 10-1300
February 199892.4Good7 out of 10-1100
September 199592.4Good7 out of 10-1000
October 199392.4Good7 out of 10-870
October 199192.4Good7 out of 10-810

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Culvert
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.160016000