EASTMAN DUBLIN HWY over GUM SWAMP CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+32.25464, -83.1401432°15'17" N, 83°08'25" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | EASTMAN DUBLIN HWY over GUM SWAMP CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000009100400 |
Location: | 4.5 MI NE OF EASTMAN |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
Total length: | 319.9 ft. [97.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 47.2 ft. [14.4 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1993 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,650 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.5 |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,875,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2650 | 99.5 |
December 2015 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2650 | 99.5 |
December 2013 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2650 | 99.5 |
December 2011 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2950 | 99.5 |
December 2009 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2770 | 99.5 |
December 2007 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2770 | 99.5 |
November 2005 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2970 | 99.4 |
December 2003 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2800 | 99.2 |
January 2002 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 3000 | 99.2 |
December 1999 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2690 | 99.2 |
February 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2690 | 99.2 |
September 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2690 | 99.1 |
October 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2690 | 99.1 |
March 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2690 | 99.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 480 | 480 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,440 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 3,784 | 3,784 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 11,352 | 11,352 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 48 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pile | each | 24 | 6 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,299 | 0 | 0 | 1,226 | 73 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 266 | 258 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 132 | 44 | 44 | 0 | 44 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 520 | 514 | 6 | 0 | 0 |