SR 27 - US 341 (WB over SUGAR CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+32.19767, -83.2160032°11'52" N, 83°12'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 27 - US 341 (WB over SUGAR CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000009100410 |
Location: | 2 MI W OF EASTMAN |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Total length: | 84.0 ft. [25.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 41.3 ft. [12.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1993 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,750 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.8 |
Estimated cost of work: | $492,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3750 | 99.8 |
December 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 3750 | 99.8 |
December 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 3750 | 99.8 |
December 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 3780 | 99.8 |
December 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 4060 | 99.8 |
December 2007 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 4060 | 99.8 |
November 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 3280 | 99.9 |
December 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 3400 | 99.8 |
January 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 3200 | 99.9 |
December 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 4390 | 99.8 |
February 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 4390 | 97.8 |
September 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4390 | 97.7 |
October 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4390 | 97.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 420 | 420 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 3,468 | 3,468 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 98 | 96 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pile | each | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 138 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 138 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 86 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 176 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 88 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 168 | 168 | 0 | 0 | 0 |