FRIENDSHIP BAPTIST over SUGAR CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+32.10977, -83.1154232°06'35" N, 83°06'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | FRIENDSHIP BAPTIST over SUGAR CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000009150040 |
Location: | 3 MI W OF CHAUNCEY |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.3 ft. [7.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1960 |
Year reconstructed: | 2001 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 490 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 82.3 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $586,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 490 | 82.3 |
December 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 490 | 82.3 |
December 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 490 | 82.3 |
December 2011 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 600 | 80.8 |
December 2009 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 620 | 76.4 |
November 2007 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 620 | 76.4 |
November 2005 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 390 | 76.4 |
January 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 740 | 76.4 |
January 2002 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 740 | 67.3 |
December 1999 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 470 | 29.6 |
January 1998 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 450 | 29.6 |
September 1995 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 430 | 28.6 |
October 1993 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 400 | 29.7 |
October 1991 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 322 | 29.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 800 | 800 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 2,520 | 2,520 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 54 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Pile | each | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 108 | 106 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 96 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 200 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 0 |