US 80 / SR 26 over REEDY CREEK


+32.59491, -82.20791
32°35'42" N, 82°12'28" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:US 80 / SR 26 over REEDY CREEK
Structure number:000000010700210
Location:2.9 MI NW OF TWIN CITY
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:8.9 ft. [2.7 m]
Total length:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1985
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,590 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:60.4 tons [54.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.0
Estimated cost of work:$229,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
October 201596.0Good7 out of 10-3590
October 201396.0Good7 out of 10-3590
October 201196.0Good7 out of 10-3590
October 200996.1Good7 out of 10-3430
October 200796.1Good7 out of 10-3430
October 200596.1Good7 out of 10-3450
October 200396.4Good7 out of 10-3200
December 200196.4Good7 out of 10-3200
January 200096.6Fair6 out of 10-3000
October 199794.6Fair6 out of 10-3000
July 199583.1Fair5 out of 10-3000
September 199383.2Fair5 out of 10-2950
September 199194.7Good8 out of 10-2950

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.196019600