Share:

TUCKER ROAD over ENNIS BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+32.12771, -81.93667
32°07'40" N, 81°56'12" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:TUCKER ROAD over ENNIS BRANCH
Structure number:000000010950070
Location:1 MI S OF CLAXTON
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Total length:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.3 ft. [7.7 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Bridge closed to all traffic [K]
Average daily traffic:490 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:29.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$281,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
January 2018PoorGoodSatisfactorySerious49029.6
January 2017PoorGoodSatisfactorySerious49029.6
February 2016PoorGoodSatisfactoryImminent Failure49029.6
February 2015PoorGoodSatisfactoryCritical49029.6
February 2014PoorGoodSatisfactoryImminent Failure49029.6
February 2013PoorGoodSatisfactoryImminent Failure60029.5
February 2012PoorGoodGoodImminent Failure60029.5
February 2011PoorGoodGoodImminent Failure62029.5
February 2009PoorGoodGoodPoor62029.5
February 2007FairGoodGoodFair63066.1
February 2005FairGoodGoodFair74061.8
February 2003FairGoodGoodFair74061.8
February 2001FairGoodGoodFair48064.8
March 1999FairGoodGoodFair47063.3
March 1996FairGoodGoodFair43070.8
April 1994FairGoodGoodFair40071.8
May 1992FairGoodGoodFair40071.8
August 1990FairGoodGoodFair27066.2

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beamlinear ft.3363043200
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.2,0162,016000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.1,2151,215000
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.5050000
Timber Pileeach104600
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.7575000
Joints
Pourable Jointlinear ft.9696000