SR 79 over SOAP CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+33.83183, -82.4723233°49'55" N, 82°28'20" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 79 over SOAP CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000018100200 |
Location: | 2.7 MI NE OF LINCOLNTON |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Total length: | 240.2 ft. [73.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 41.3 ft. [12.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1993 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 6 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 770 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.7 |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,407,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 770 | 99.7 |
December 2016 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 770 | 88.6 |
December 2014 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 770 | 88.6 |
December 2012 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 770 | 88.6 |
January 2011 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 1000 | 88.5 |
January 2009 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 1000 | 88.5 |
December 2006 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 890 | 88.6 |
December 2004 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 1000 | 88.5 |
December 2002 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 2100 | 87.0 |
December 2000 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 3900 | 86.1 |
December 1998 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 3100 | 86.5 |
February 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1900 | 99.2 |
March 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1900 | 99.1 |
June 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1340 | 99.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,200 | 1,200 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 9,912 | 9,792 | 120 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 84 | 76 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pile | each | 45 | 25 | 4 | 16 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 3,572 | 3,572 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 190 | 165 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 266 | 190 | 0 | 76 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 480 | 420 | 60 | 0 | 0 |