Share:

HOG JOWL ROAD over VOILES CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+34.73786, -85.38251
34°44'16" N, 85°22'57" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:HOG JOWL ROAD over VOILES CREEK
Structure number:000000029550680
Location:6.1 MI NW OF LAFAYETTE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Total length:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.3 ft. [7.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1929
Year reconstructed:1971
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:710 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:47.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$147,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2017FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory71047.4
February 2015FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory71030.9
February 2013FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory71030.9
February 2011FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory199020.0
February 2009FairGoodSatisfactoryGood199020.0
January 2007FairGoodSatisfactoryGood199020.0
January 2005FairGoodSatisfactoryGood211016.2
January 2003FairGoodSatisfactoryGood97023.3
January 2001FairGoodSatisfactoryGood122063.6
January 1999FairGoodSatisfactoryGood107063.7
June 1996FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory94063.8
April 1994FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory93064.3
April 1992FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory93064.3
September 1990FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory89064.4

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beamlinear ft.176017600
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.952009520
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.678678000
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.6786572100
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.129300
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.60204000
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.4848000