FREEMAN SPRINGS RD over EAST CHICKAMAUGA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+34.76025, -85.0824034°45'37" N, 85°04'57" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | FREEMAN SPRINGS RD over EAST CHICKAMAUGA CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000031350410 |
Location: | 6.3 MI W OF DALTON |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Total length: | 76.1 ft. [23.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1921 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 600 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 59.8 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $324,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 600 | 59.8 |
June 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 600 | 59.8 |
June 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 600 | 59.8 |
June 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 620 | 59.8 |
July 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 620 | 59.8 |
May 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 630 | 59.8 |
April 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 740 | 59.8 |
June 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 740 | 59.8 |
April 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 480 | 59.8 |
June 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 450 | 59.8 |
December 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 430 | 59.8 |
January 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 390 | 59.8 |
February 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 390 | 59.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 76 | 0 | 68 | 8 | 0 |
Substructure |
Other Material Abutment | linear ft. | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 152 | 146 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Deck |
Other Material Deck | sq. ft. | 1,048 | 1,048 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,048 | 0 | 0 | 1,048 | 0 |