MAMALAHOA over MAMALAHOA/HAKALAU STRM
Map
Coordinates:
+19.89721, -155.1322719°53'50" N, 155°07'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | MAMALAHOA over MAMALAHOA/HAKALAU STRM |
Structure number: | 001290001100003 |
Location: | TMK 2-9-02:25 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 66.9 ft. [20.4 m] |
Total length: | 66.9 ft. [20.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1930 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Other [9] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 1986] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 40.0 |
Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
Estimated cost of work: | $11,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Poor | - | Good | Critical | 20 | 40.0 |
June 2015 | Fair | - | Good | Fair | 20 | 75.9 |
June 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 86.9 |
November 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 86.9 |
November 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 86.9 |
December 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 87.9 |
April 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 94.0 |
April 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 94.0 |
April 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 90.8 |
April 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 90.8 |
April 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 89.8 |
April 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 89.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 64 | 50 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,360 | 1,360 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 45 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 136 | 0 | 136 | 0 | 0 |