MAIN ST over UP RR
Map
Coordinates:
+41.23317, -93.2435441°13'59" N, 93°14'37" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | MAIN ST over UP RR |
Structure number: | 000000000002855 |
Location: | 000000000 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over railroad |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Total length: | 106.0 ft. [32.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1940 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Number of main spans: | 7 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,000 [as of 2010] |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 2.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 1000 | 2.0 |
January 2016 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 1000 | 2.0 |
January 2014 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 1000 | 2.0 |
December 2011 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 1000 | 2.0 |
March 2010 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 900 | 2.6 |
April 2008 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | 900 | 2.6 |
June 2006 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | 900 | 2.6 |
May 2004 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | 900 | 2.6 |
June 2003 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | 900 | 2.6 |
April 2001 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | 450 | 9.8 |
July 1999 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 450 | 30.5 |
March 1997 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 450 | 31.5 |
May 1995 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 450 | 30.5 |
May 1994 | Poor | Fair | Good | Serious | 610 | 7.3 |
March 1993 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Serious | 610 | 7.3 |
July 1990 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 610 | 45.6 |