180TH STREET over MT. ZION BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+41.04327, -94.5969241°02'36" N, 94°35'49" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | 180TH STREET over MT. ZION BRANCH |
Structure number: | 000000000059730 |
Location: | 072331301 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Total length: | 103.0 ft. [31.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1964 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 410 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 57.3 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 410 | 57.3 |
January 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 470 | 57.3 |
February 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 470 | 57.3 |
February 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 560 | 56.1 |
March 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 560 | 56.1 |
February 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 470 | 57.3 |
January 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 470 | 57.3 |
February 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 480 | 54.3 |
April 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 480 | 65.3 |
May 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 300 | 69.0 |
October 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 300 | 69.0 |
October 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 120 | 73.3 |
November 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 120 | 73.5 |
November 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 110 | 73.5 |