+42.33611, -91.17500
42°20'10" N, 91°10'30" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:200TH over SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000000103741
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Total length:127.0 ft. [38.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1985
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:70 [as of 2010]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:35.0 tons [31.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:11.4 tons [10.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:59.4
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
May 201659.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO70
May 201459.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO70
May 201259.4GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO70
May 201059.2GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO70
May 200859.2GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO70
June 200659.4GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO70
April 200459.4GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO70
July 200259.4GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO70
April 200059.4GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO70
July 199859.4GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO70
July 199689.5GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good-70
April 1994100.0GoodVery Good-Very Good-80
June 1992100.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-80
July 1990100.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-80