Share: 
ROOSEVELT AVE over MILL CR
Map
Coordinates:
+41.93304, -91.02001
41°55'59" N, 91°01'12" W
+41.93304, -91.02001
41°55'59" N, 91°01'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | ROOSEVELT AVE over MILL CR |
| Structure number: | 000000000104531 |
| Location: | 082020106 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
| Total length: | 116.1 ft. [35.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 15° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2005 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2015
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 90 [as of 2010] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 90 | 100.0 |
| May 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 90 | 100.0 |
| May 2011 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 90 | 100.0 |
| May 2009 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 90 | 100.0 |
| July 2007 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 90 | 100.0 |
| June 2005 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 90 | 100.0 |
© Copyright 2012-19, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1113446
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1113446