LOCAL over LITTLE WATERMAN CR

Map

Coordinates:
+43.08781, -95.46722
43°05'16" N, 95°28'02" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	LOCAL over LITTLE WATERMAN CR
Structure number:	000000000260780
Location:	096393302
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	44.9 ft. `[13.7 m]`
Total length:	90.9 ft. `[27.7 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	18.0 ft. `[5.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	18.0 ft. `[5.5 m]`
Skew angle:	45°
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year reconstructed:	1949
Historic significance:	Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[3]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Steel `[3]`
Main spans design:	Truss - Deck `[09]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	35 `[as of 2015]`
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	36.0
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
July 2018	Poor	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Poor	35	36.0
June 2017	Poor	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Poor	35	36.0
February 2017	Poor	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Poor	35	36.0
June 2015	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	25	42.1
August 2014	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	25	42.1
June 2013	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	25	42.1
June 2012	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	25	42.1
August 2011	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	25	46.3
August 2010	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	25	46.0
August 2009	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	25	56.0
August 2008	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	25	56.0
September 2006	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	20	56.3
September 2004	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	20	56.3
July 2002	Good	Good	Good	Good	20	56.3
July 2000	Good	Good	Good	Good	20	56.3
May 1998	Good	Good	Good	Good	40	56.3
July 1996	Good	Good	Good	Good	40	56.3
May 1994	Good	Good	Good	Good	40	46.7
April 1992	Good	Good	Good	Good	40	46.7
May 1990	Good	Good	Good	Good	45	53.9