Share:

I 90RAMP EB OFF over PINE CREEK;EB OFF RAMP

Map

Coordinates:
+47.54416, -116.23184
47°32'39" N, 116°13'55" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:I 90RAMP EB OFF over PINE CREEK;EB OFF RAMP
Structure number:000000000017405
Location:5.1 W. KELLOGG
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01]
Length of largest span:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Total length:124.0 ft. [37.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Skew angle:31°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1977
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:500 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:68.9 tons [62.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.0 tons [21.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:74.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,125,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201574.7FairFairFairSatisfactory-500
June 201384.7FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-500
June 201196.8FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-600
June 200997.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-600
June 200797.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-600
June 200597.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-600
June 200397.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-700
June 200197.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-700
June 199995.9FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-500
June 199797.9GoodGoodGoodGood-500
September 199597.7GoodGoodGoodGood-950
August 199497.7GoodGoodGoodGood-950
August 199297.8GoodGoodGoodGood-680
August 199097.8GoodGoodVery GoodGood-680

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Superstructure
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girderlinear ft.8646261301080
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Top Flangesq. ft.3,1002,33007700
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.3,100003,1000
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.3730700
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.63501300
Joints
Pourable Jointlinear ft.501816016
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearingeach2802800
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.2882563200