TIN CUP ROAD over TIN CUP CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.98769, -111.2879742°59'16" N, 111°17'17" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | TIN CUP ROAD over TIN CUP CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000023307 |
Location: | 1.2 N. 4.5 E. WAYAN |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Total length: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1989 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 82.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 82.0 |
September 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 82.0 |
September 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 82.0 |
September 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 82.0 |
September 2010 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 10 | 82.0 |
September 2008 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 10 | 82.0 |
September 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 10 | 82.0 |
September 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 10 | 82.0 |
September 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 82.0 |
September 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 82.0 |
May 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 82.0 |
May 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 82.0 |
April 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 82.0 |
August 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 82.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Timber Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 108 | 108 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Timber Column | each | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Abutment | linear ft. | 38 | 34 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Timber Deck | sq. ft. | 420 | 420 | 0 | 0 | 0 |