Share:

FIR GROVE ROAD over CAMAS CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+43.28694, -114.74750
43°17'13" N, 114°44'51" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FIR GROVE ROAD over CAMAS CREEK
Structure number:000000000023835
Location:3.6 S. 2.3 E. FAIRFIELD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Total length:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Gravel [8]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:80 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:13% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:37.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$388,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2017PoorFairSeriousPoor8037.9
June 2016PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2015PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2014PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2013PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2012PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2011PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2010PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2009PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2008PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2007PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2006PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2005PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2004PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2003PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2002PoorFairPoorPoor8039.9
June 2000PoorFairPoorFair8040.9
June 1999PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair8041.9
June 1998PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair8041.9
June 1997PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair8041.9
June 1996PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair8041.9
June 1995PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair8041.9
June 1994PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair8041.9
June 1993PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair8041.9
June 1992PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair8041.9
June 1991PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair8041.9

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Timber Girder/Beamlinear ft.86307388738
Substructure
Timber Columneach70070
Timber Abutmentlinear ft.48036120
Timber Pier Caplinear ft.2402400
Deck
Timber Decksq. ft.846083709