+43.29333, -114.69278
43°17'36" N, 114°41'34" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:OLD HWY 46;500 E over CAMAS CREEK
Structure number:000000000023870
Location:3.4 S. 5.0 E. FAIRFIELD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Total length:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.3 ft. [7.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Gravel [8]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:20 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:50% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:75.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$380,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2075.8
June 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2075.8
June 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2075.8
June 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3062.0
June 2010FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3062.0
June 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3062.0
June 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3062.0
June 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3062.0
June 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3062.0
June 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3062.0
June 2004FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3062.0
June 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3062.0
June 2002FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3055.3
June 2000FairSatisfactoryFairFair3056.2
June 1999FairSatisfactoryFairFair3056.2
June 1998FairSatisfactoryFairFair3056.2
June 1997PoorSatisfactoryFairPoor3044.2
June 1996PoorSatisfactoryFairPoor3044.2
June 1995PoorSatisfactoryFairPoor3044.2
June 1994PoorSatisfactoryFairPoor3044.2
June 1993PoorSatisfactoryFairPoor3044.2
June 1992PoorSatisfactoryFairPoor3044.2
June 1991PoorSatisfactoryFairPoor3044.2

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Timber Girder/Beamlinear ft.3960372240
Timber Columneach50230
Timber Abutmentlinear ft.48024240
Timber Pier Caplinear ft.2402400
Timber Decksq. ft.1,02301,02300
Bridge Rail
Timber Bridge Raillinear ft.85006421