Share:

RIVER ROAD over GRAND VIEW IRRG.DIST.CNL

Map

Coordinates:
+42.99722, -116.13889
42°59'50" N, 116°08'20" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RIVER ROAD over GRAND VIEW IRRG.DIST.CNL
Structure number:000000000028240
Location:1.0 N. 2.1 W. GRAND VIEW
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Total length:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.6 ft. [6.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1986
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:90 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:65.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$305,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2017FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
February 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
February 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
February 2013FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 2010FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 2005FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 2004FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 2003FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 2002FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 2000FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 1999FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9065.3
March 1998FairGoodSatisfactoryGood9065.3
March 1997FairGoodSatisfactoryGood9065.3
March 1996FairGoodSatisfactoryGood9065.3
March 1995FairGoodSatisfactoryGood9065.3
March 1994FairGoodSatisfactoryGood9065.3
March 1992FairGoodSatisfactoryGood9065.3
March 1990FairVery GoodSatisfactoryVery Good9065.3

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Closed Web/Box Girderlinear ft.8228000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.153007578
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.57017040000
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.540540000
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.8785200