HOT SPRINGS ROAD over BUCKAROO CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+42.79194, -115.7180642°47'31" N, 115°43'05" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HOT SPRINGS ROAD over BUCKAROO CANAL |
Structure number: | 000000000028282 |
Location: | 6.1 S. 3.9 E. BRUNEAU |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Skew angle: | 10° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1989 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 90 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 96.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 96.9 |
February 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 96.9 |
February 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 96.9 |
April 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 96.9 |
April 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 96.9 |
April 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 96.9 |
April 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 96.9 |
April 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 96.9 |
April 2000 | Good | - | - | - | 90 | 96.9 |
April 1998 | Good | - | - | - | 90 | 96.9 |
April 1996 | Good | - | - | - | 90 | 96.9 |
April 1994 | Good | - | - | - | 90 | 99.9 |
April 1992 | Good | - | - | - | 90 | 99.9 |
April 1990 | Good | - | - | - | 90 | 99.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 883 | 883 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 883 | 883 | 0 | 0 | 0 |