SHOOFLY CUTOFF over LITTLE VALLEY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.80778, -115.9161142°48'28" N, 115°54'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SHOOFLY CUTOFF over LITTLE VALLEY CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000028285 |
Location: | 5.0 S. 6.1 W. BRUNEAU |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Total length: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Skew angle: | 10° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1974 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 110 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 83.1 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $333,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 110 | 83.1 |
February 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 110 | 83.1 |
February 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 110 | 82.8 |
February 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 110 | 82.8 |
April 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 110 | 82.8 |
April 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 110 | 82.8 |
April 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 110 | 82.8 |
April 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 110 | 82.8 |
April 2001 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 110 | 71.8 |
April 1999 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 110 | 71.8 |
April 1997 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 110 | 71.8 |
April 1996 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 110 | 55.8 |
April 1994 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 110 | 55.8 |
April 1992 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 110 | 55.8 |
April 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 110 | 76.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 79 | 77 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 667 | 667 | 0 | 0 | 0 |