BOULDER ROAD over MEADOW CR;SPENCER RES BR
Map
Coordinates:
+42.81803, -116.6438142°49'05" N, 116°38'38" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | BOULDER ROAD over MEADOW CR;SPENCER RES BR |
Structure number: | 000000000028316 |
Location: | 22.7 W. OREANA |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1992 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 30 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 83.2 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $291,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 83.2 |
July 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 83.2 |
July 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 78.9 |
July 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 78.0 |
July 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 78.0 |
July 2007 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 77.9 |
July 2005 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 77.9 |
July 2003 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 77.9 |
July 2001 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 77.9 |
July 1999 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 77.9 |
July 1997 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 77.9 |
July 1995 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 78.1 |
July 1994 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 78.1 |
July 1993 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 78.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 33 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 33 | 31 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Timber Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 354 | 0 | 354 | 0 | 0 |