Share:

KILLEBREW DRIVE over LOWER PAYETTE DITCH

Map

Coordinates:
+44.03972, -116.87167
44°02'23" N, 116°52'18" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:KILLEBREW DRIVE over LOWER PAYETTE DITCH
Structure number:000000000028450
Location:2.1 N. 2.1 E. FRUITLAND
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1959
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:360 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:14% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:76.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$386,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
November 2016FairFairFairSatisfactory36076.1
November 2014FairFairFairSatisfactory36076.1
November 2013FairFairFairSatisfactory30076.2
November 2012FairFairFairSatisfactory30076.1
November 2011FairFairFairSatisfactory30076.1
November 2010FairFairFairSatisfactory30076.1
November 2009FairFairFairSatisfactory36076.1
November 2008FairFairFairSatisfactory36076.1
November 2007FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 2006FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 2005FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 2004FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 2003FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 2002FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 2000FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 1999FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 1998FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 1997FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 1996FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 1995FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 1994FairFairFairFair35076.1
November 1993FairFairFairFair30076.1
November 1992FairFairFairFair30076.1
November 1991FairFairFairFair30076.1

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.145014320
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.6666000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.231231000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Slabsq. ft.92605244020